郑州台积电搬走了吗？大陆南京台积电搬走了吗

本文目录

• 郑州台积电搬走了吗
• 大陆南京台积电搬走了吗
• 台积电搬到美国中国怎么阻拦
• 台积电搬迁到美国时间
• 台积电搬迁到美国中国是什么反应
• 台积电搬迁到美国台还有工厂吗
• 制造业回流美国，没有想象中那么容易

郑州台积电搬走了吗

郑州台积电搬走了。根据查询相关信息显示，台积电在2022年11月1日搬去美国。台积电是台湾的生产芯片企业，台积电在美国开始建厂，计划将其先进芯片的制造生产线设在美国。台湾积体电路制造股份有限公司，简称台积电、TSMC，是台湾一家半导体制造公司，成立于1987年，是全球第一家、以及最大的专业集成电路制造服务（晶圆代工）企业。

大陆南京台积电搬走了吗

大陆南京台积电没搬走。根据查询相关公开信息：台积电（南京）有限公司于2016年05月16日在南京市工商行政管理局登记成立，目前正常生产中，并未改变地址。

台积电搬到美国中国怎么阻拦

台积电又不是国有企业，为什么要阻拦？想去就去，不想去就不去，都是生意。还有，你不会以为没有台积电的芯片，我国就没有芯片用了吧？2021年中国大陆进口芯片：10000亿来自台湾，6000亿来自韩国，4000亿来自越南。台积电不往大陆卖芯片，找韩国、越南呗。就算全都不卖了，芯片又不是不能国产，最多也就是性能落后一代、电子产品竞争力下降。小区门口的粮油店搬走了，难道整个小区的人就没有米吃了？不会吧 不会吧 不会吧。粮油店搬走了，你去超市买呗。或者去网上买呗。一家粮油店搬走了，其他家很快就会来补这个窟窿。为啥要想着阻拦粮油店搬迁呢？你管得着么？

台积电搬迁到美国时间

2022年12月6日。当地时间12月6日，台积电位于美国亚利桑那州凤凰城的工厂正式举行迁机仪式。美国总统拜登亲至，一声美国制造业回来了，让岛内舆论破防。不少岛内群众更是悲叹，台积电可以改叫美积电了。

台积电搬迁到美国中国是什么反应

台积电搬往美国最直接的影响就是将会导致很多人员失业。当然影响更大的则是台湾，台积电是台湾岛内最重要的企业之一。在经济上，台积电作为世界芯片制造业的龙头，即使在新冠疫情导致国际产业链和供应链受到严重冲击，多家芯片制造厂都停工的情况下，使台岛经济在逆境中都还能保持增长，因此还被岛内民众称为“护岛神山”。在2021年仅半导体就占台湾出口的34.8%，这就体现了台积电在台湾的经济实力。同时，台积电搬往美国也会对我国的芯片市场造成一定的冲击，而美国也在逐渐实现他今年刚颁布的实行的对芯片的制裁，要将芯片的核心技术牢牢把握在自己的手中。这可能在未来几年中国的芯片行业会发展缓慢，但是作为一个越挫越勇的中华民族，这些困难都阻止不了我们前进的脚步，及时目前看来会有短时间段的影响，但我相信在这个逆境中，更能激发我们的意志，更加加快我们对于芯片技术的掌握及开发，使我们能更快的掌握芯片技术，并走在科技创新的前沿，早日实现我们科技强国的愿景。4、台积电会成功吗？搬往美国这个举动和当年的富士康一模一样，虽然没有把全部产业搬过去，但是几乎将产业里80%的核心技术都已经准备搬去美国。这些人才依然使用原先培养的技术人才，但是很多劳动密集型产业的基层劳动力都会从美国市场重新进行招录，这个成本基本是国内市场的两倍以上，可想而知去了美国的劳动力成本会增加多少？并且在台积电前往美国发展之后，国内相关的企业也会抓住这些机会迅速崛起，实现国内芯片的自给自足。而台积电则会渐渐失去芯片制造巨头的地位。所以他在美国建厂能不能成功，就让我们拭目以待吧！不过对于我国的环境还是需要改变的，对于科技型人才的待遇需要改善，人才培养不是一朝一夕的事，每一个人才都是耗费了大量的人力物力，对于每一个人才的流失都让我们痛心。我们不能让那些默默奉献，不露面的，为了我国发展呕心沥血的人寒了心。

台积电搬迁到美国台还有工厂吗

台积电位于美国亚利桑那州凤凰城的工厂，6日迎来迁机仪式，包括美国总统拜登在内的重要人物出席。台积电这次在美国开厂也被认为是美国有意在芯片制造领域“去台化”，将先进制程搬迁到美国，虽然美国在台协会以及台积电都否认，但岛内普遍担心台湾将被掏空。

制造业回流美国，没有想象中那么容易

美媒根据《美国制造业回流指数》笃定：美国将在2025年实现超84%的美国企业部分或者全部回流其制造业务。我个人认为，大选将至，美国现任总统又拿前任总统的业绩来画饼了。

美前总统为制造业回流做了啥？

美前总统上台后，致力于重振美国制造业，他提出了一系列的政策和计划。围绕着推动制造业回流，在贸易、税收、监管等方面进行调整，希望重新将具有竞争力的产业引回美国。

他采取各种手段保护本土生产者，比如惩罚中国进口货物加征关税，谈判美墨加北美自由贸易协定，以及退出跨太平洋伙伴关系等等。此类行动助力美国的制造业变得更具吸引力，并使本土公司不再仅仅只考虑成本优势去外包生产。

他枪枪打中我们中国的痛点，比如：禁止华为购买芯片、禁止华为使用安卓系统、导致华为在市场占有率短暂位列世界第一后，急剧下降。画饼让台积电等芯片代工企业赴美建厂，让世界所有芯片代工企业都捏在美国手里。禁止先进光刻机对华出口，导致中国芯片设计发展，止步3纳米。惩罚中国高校，让中国高端制造业人才无法出国留学和正常回流。

他提出减少企业税负、疏解运营及生产过程中的各种阻碍，同时使企业更容易获得财政资金支持。这不仅让美国企业将制造业回流国内，甚至还吸引了一部分中国企业赴美建厂。他提出政府采购美国优先，这又促使一部分产品的生产在美国形成完整供应链。

所谓制造业回流有局限性

美国的所谓制造业回流其实本身就是一张大饼，有很大的行业局限性。在美国制造业中，一些高技术含量或高附加值的产业相对容易回流，如航空、汽车、芯片、计算机等行业。这些行业具有技术密集性、创新能力强以及对资本、人才、技术等方面的需求大等特点。

而在一些劳动密集型的产业，例如轻工业、纺织业等，则面临着更大的困难。这是因为劳动密集型行业的生产成本过于依赖于廉价劳动力，如果要回流，成本将显著上升，难以维持当地竞争力。此外还需要考虑到供应链、设施建设等问题，以及长途跋涉可能引入风险和延迟等问题。

选民之所以支持制造业回流，是希望能够获得工作岗位，但是美国搞的所谓制造业回流，产生的岗位其实和大多数学历水平一般的美国人没有任何关系。

现任总统拿前总统的业绩来画饼

美国现任总统在制造业回流上几乎没做任何事，他采取的行动几乎没有任何的创见，就是躺在前任总统的业绩上。他的“1.9万亿美元的经济刺激计划”，其实就是因为出现通货紧缩，不得不向市场投放资金。因为通货紧缩，美国的就业岗位不仅没有增加，反而因为企业经营困难而有所减少。

他提议的“提高公司税率和加强打击假冒伪劣货物等措施“号称是保护本土制造业，其实就是一个口号，美国正常法制运行下，这些工作本来就要进行。但是，加税的做法，让很多赴美建设工厂的企业大呼上当。

所以，这个时候美媒说制造业回流取得成效，歌颂美现任总统的业绩，其实是前总统的。为了选票，拿前任的业绩来画饼和前任总统，继续竞争马上来临的选举，也是有点滑稽。

英文版："Over 80% of US manufacturing will return in three years?" The achievement of the former president is now being boasted about by the current president.

According to the "US Manufacturing Reshoring Index," U.S. media is convinced that over 84% of American companies will partially or fully reshore their manufacturing operations by 2025. Personally, I think that with the presidential election approaching, the current U.S. president is boasting about the achievements of the former president again.

What did the former U.S. president do for the reshoring of manufacturing?

After taking office, the former U.S. president was committed to revitalizing American manufacturing and proposed a series of policies and plans. He made adjustments in trade, taxation, regulation and other areas aimed at promoting reshoring of manufacturing, hoping to bring competitive industries back to the United States.

He took various measures to protect domestic producers, such as imposing tariffs on Chinese imports, negotiating the USMCA free trade agreement between the United States, Mexico, and Canada, and withdrawing from the Trans-Pacific Partnership. These actions helped to make American manufacturing more attractive and led domestic companies to no longer only consider cost advantages when outsourcing production.

He hit the pain points of China, such as prohibiting Huawei from purchasing chips and using the Android system, which caused Huawei’s market share to decline rapidly after briefly ranking first in the world. He invited TSMC and other chip foundries to build factories in the United States and brought all chip foundries in the world under America’s control. He prevented advanced lithography machines from being exported to China, causing China’s chip design to stagnate at 3 nm. He punished Chinese universities, making it difficult for top-notch talent in China’s high-end manufacturing industry to study abroad and return home normally.

He proposed reducing corporate tax burdens, eliminating various obstacles in the operation and production process, and making it easier for businesses to obtain financial support. This not only allowed American companies to reshore manufacturing domestically, but also attracted some Chinese companies to build factories in the United States. He proposed government procurement with "Buy American" priority, which promoted the formation of a complete supply chain for some products in the United States.

The so-called reshoring of manufacturing has limitations.

The so-called reshoring of manufacturing in the United States is actually a big pie with significant industry limitations. In the US manufacturing sector, some industries with high technology content or high added value are comparatively easy to reshore, such as aviation, automotive, semiconductor, computer and other industries. These industries have characteristics such as technology intensity, strong innovation ability, and large demand for capital, talent, technology, etc.

However, in some labor-intensive industries, such as light industry, textiles, they face greater difficulties. This is because the production cost of labor-intensive industries is too dependent on cheap labor. If they want to reshore, the cost will significantly increase, which will be difficult to maintain local competitiveness. In addition, supply chain, facility construction and other issues need to be considered, as well as risks and delays that may be introduced by long-distance transportation.

The reason why voters support reshoring of manufacturing is to obtain job opportunities, but the jobs created through the so-called reshoring of manufacturing in the United States actually have nothing to do with most average-educated Americans.

The current president is using the achievements of the former president to boast.

The current President of the United States has done almost nothing to bring back manufacturing, and his actions have been largely uncreative, relying on the achievements of the former president. His $1.9 trillion economic stimulus plan was simply a response to deflationary pressures that required market intervention. However, due to deflation, employment in the United States not only did not increase but actually decreased due to ongoing difficulties in business operations.

His proposal to "raise corporate tax rates and strengthen measures to combat counterfeit goods" is purportedly designed to protect domestic manufacturing, but is actually just a slogan. These are works that should have been carried out under normal legal procedures in the United States. However, the practice of raising taxes has left many enterprises that intended to build factories in America feeling deceived.

Therefore, when the American media praises the effectiveness of bringing back manufacturing, they are essentially singing the praises of the achievements of the former president, not the current one. Claiming credit for the achievements of the previous administration in order to win votes and compete in the upcoming election is somewhat ridiculous.